Norwich Neighborhoods

THE DAY LETTERS TO EDITOR

CAN THE PLAN!
BYRON BROOK
Site Plan
CDPP Color map
Contact Can the Plan Committee
State Committee Contacts
Contact the City Council
Can the Plan Articles
Pictures of Hansen, Scotland and Whiteplains Rd
More Hansen/Scotland and Whiteplains pics
Home
Washington Street Overlay/Rezone

Scroll down for
  • Spot Zoning in Norwich Helps Only Developers

  • 'Spot Zoning' Plan in Norwich A Bad Idea

  • Reject Spot Zoning 

  • Tell Norwich Councilors to Quash Spot Zoning

 

Spot Zoning In Norwich Helps Only Developers

To The Editor Of The Day:

 

   Published on 8/17/2007

Spot zoning. My question is, how many Walgreens will Norwich be able or willing to support from a shared mini mall on Route 82 to a residential neighborhood?

Looking back to the early 1980s, many locally owned stores left downtown for Norwichtown and the mall, including Reid and Hughes in 1987. The large five-story building owned by the city of Norwich on Main Street has been vacant and deteriorating ever since.

Will history repeat itself if Walgreens leaves West Main Street for Benedict Arnold's historic site on a tree-lined street in a residential neighborhood? The only benefit of this spot zoning is to the outside developer.

Do we need this spot-zoning change or do we need new spots on the city council?

Ivan Martin
Norwich

THE DAY

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

SEPT. 6, 2007

 

'Spot Zoning' Plan In Norwich A Bad Idea

To The Editor Of The Day:

 

   Published on 9/6/2007

 

I am deeply concerned about the recent push to add “spot zoning” along the Washington Street corridor in Norwich. There seems to be no real logic behind the push to put a new strip mall into a well-established residential neighborhood.

To accomplish this senseless task, they would have to demolish any number of lovely old single and multi-family homes, several of which are well over 100 years old. With the current housing shortage, what sense is there in knocking down housing when we already have ample vacant commercial space in the Norwichtown Mall?

And what of the traffic congestion? It's dangerous enough to pass by The William W. Backus Hospital during rush hour as it is. Getting out of the side streets is almost worth your life during daylight hours. How do they expect to accommodate even more traffic over here? What will they do next? Annex the remaining homes along Washington Street to widen the road?

We are just a short distance from Norwich Free Academy, with students walking to and from school daily. How much more dangerous will their walk to school be with added traffic in an already congested area? Who is this supposed to benefit?

We didn't ask for, don't need, and don't want another vacant strip mall in Norwichtown.

Hattie Fairbanks
Norwich

THE DAY

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Aug 31, 2007

 

Reject Spot Zoning

To The Editor Of The Day:

Published on 8/31/2007

It is past time for the Norwich City Council to say no to proposals from commercial developers to use spot zoning to enrich themselves.  Spot zoning makes a mockery of Norwich’s Plan of Conservation and Development and the city’s comprehensive zoning ordinance.  The only real beneficiary of such spot zoning is the developer, and their gain comes at the loss of property values and the quality of life in nearby residential neighborhoods. 

 

It appears that the proponents of an ill-conceived Commercial Overlay District throughout Norwich are back and are pursuing what was always their primary objective.  This was and remains the development of a strip retail mall along upper Washington Street across from Backus Hospital and in the midst of an established, viable residential neighborhood.  The developer’s tactic this time around appears to be to convince the Norwich City Council, which functions as the city’s zoning commission, to rezone a portion of a residential zoning district to commercial through spot zoning.

 

All members of the Norwich City Council should see this latest ploy for what it is and should reject this badly flawed concept out of hand.  To initiate the spot zoning change, the developer must secure at least one Norwich alderman to introduce the application.  City council members ought to decline this dubious honor and avoid becoming the developer’s enabler.  Norwich residents expect and deserve no less from their elected officials.

 

Richard Erickson

Norwich

 

 

Tell Norwich Councilors To Quash Spot Zoning

To The Editor Of The Day:

 

   Published on 8/17/2007

Yes, it is, in fact, “in my back yard,” but in this case as with most, dismissing the following simply for “NIMBY” is a cop-out.

Rezoning Norwich's Washington Street for commercial development is wrong for Norwich for many reasons. The sole reason behind rezoning for commercial development in this section of Norwichtown is one commercial developer's plan for several box stores with large parking areas; large lighting, large delivery flow, large garbage and a 24/7 business plan (see spot zoning).

The surrounding quiet middle-class neighborhoods would be destroyed and replaced with convenience-style retail and rental properties; with landlords who vacated due to reduced quality of life and reduced property value. What precedence for a lack of long-term planning.

If you live in Norwich, look at your back yard. How long until you're on the defensive? They say the traffic counts whet the developers' appetites.

Well, with Norwich residents getting around — coupled with our beloved casino patrons and beachgoers passing through — there are plenty of traffic numbers to be totaled. See the recent overlay zone debacle for the neighborhood nearest you.

Send the message to the Norwich City Council that these shortsighted proposals only line the pockets of out-of-town developers and their lawyers, offering no long-term benefits for Norwich and its residents. Downtown Norwich largely remains an unpolished gem and deer outnumber workers in our industrial park.

During this local election season, please encourage our good Norwich City Council members to maintain focus on the real prizes.

Dave Swedin
Norwich

Spot Zoning In Norwich Helps Only Developers

To The Editor Of The Day:

 

   Published on 8/17/2007

Spot zoning. My question is, how many Walgreens will Norwich be able or willing to support from a shared mini mall on Route 82 to a residential neighborhood?

Looking back to the early 1980s, many locally owned stores left downtown for Norwichtown and the mall, including Reid and Hughes in 1987. The large five-story building owned by the city of Norwich on Main Street has been vacant and deteriorating ever since.

Will history repeat itself if Walgreens leaves West Main Street for Benedict Arnold's historic site on a tree-lined street in a residential neighborhood? The only benefit of this spot zoning is to the outside developer.

Do we need this spot-zoning change or do we need new spots on the city council?

Ivan Martin
Norwich